BILL NUMBER: AB 1491	CHAPTERED  05/05/00

	CHAPTER   17
	FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE   MAY 5, 2000
	APPROVED BY GOVERNOR   MAY 5, 2000
	PASSED THE ASSEMBLY   APRIL 24, 2000
	PASSED THE SENATE   APRIL 13, 2000
	AMENDED IN SENATE   APRIL 4, 2000
	AMENDED IN SENATE   MARCH 23, 2000
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY   JANUARY 3, 2000

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Kaloogian

                        FEBRUARY 26, 1999

   An act to add Section 366.3 to the Code of Civil Procedure, and to
amend Sections 1811, 1813, 1827, 1863, 11603, 21306, and 21320 of,
to add Section 21305 to, to add Part 7 (commencing with Section
21700) to Division 11 of, and to repeal Chapter 2 (commencing with
Section 150) of Part 3 of Division 2 of, the Probate Code, relating
to estates and trusts.



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1491, Kaloogian.  Estates and trusts.
   Existing law provides that a person wishing to bring a cause of
action against a deceased person for liability arising under
contract, tort, or otherwise, has one year from the date of death to
do so, with certain exceptions.
   This bill would provide that a person with a claim arising from an
agreement with a decedent, whether oral or written, for distribution
from an estate or trust would also have one year within which to
commence an action to enforce the claim, with certain exceptions.
   Existing law provides that contracts to make or not make a will or
a devise, or to die intestate, may be established by only certain
types of evidence, including a writing signed by the decedent.
   This bill would include within the types of evidence that may be
used to prove the existence of this kind of contract clear and
convincing evidence of an agreement or a promise between the decedent
and the claimant, or between the decedent and another person for the
benefit of the claimant, that is enforceable in equity.
   Existing law provides a spouse may nominate a conservator for a
proposed conservatee.  Existing law also provides that the spouse of
an absentee, as defined, may not be appointed as a conservator of the
estate of the absentee unless the spouse alleges, and the court
finds, that the spouse has not commenced an action for dissolution of
marriage, or similar action.
   This bill would provide that the spouse of any proposed
conservatee may not petition for the appointment of a conservator of
his or her spouse, nor be appointed as a conservator of the person or
the estate for his or her spouse, unless the petitioner alleges, and
the court finds, that the spouse is not a party to an action for
dissolution of marriage, or similar action.  The bill would require
the spouse of a conservatee to disclose to the conservator, or, if
the spouse is the conservator, to disclose to the court, the filing
of any action or proceeding against the conservatee for legal
separation, dissolution of marriage, annulment, or adjudication of
nullity of marriage, within 10 days of the filing of the action or
proceeding by filing a notice with the court and serving the notice,
as specified.  The bill would provide that the court may, in that
case, set the matter for hearing on an order to show cause why the
appointment of the spouse as conservator should not be terminated.
This bill would also provide for an exception to this prohibition
when the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that
appointment of the spouse is in the best interests of the proposed
conservatee.  Additionally this bill would require the court to
appoint a counsel to consult with and advise the proposed conservatee
and report to the court.
   Existing law provides for a jury trial in the matter of the
establishment or termination of a conservatorship, if demanded, as
specified.
   This bill would instead provide for a jury trial in that matter if
demanded by the conservatee or proposed conservatee.
   Existing law governs the distribution of an estate.
   This bill would provide that if the whereabouts of a distributee
is unknown, the order for distribution shall provide for alternate
distributees and the share to which each is entitled.
   Existing law provides that a no contest clause in an instrument is
not enforceable against specified types of actions, such as an
action on the grounds of forgery, providing the action is based on
probable cause.
   This bill would provide for additional actions that would not
constitute contests unless expressly identified in the no contest
clause as violations of it.  This bill would also provide a further
list of actions that, as a matter of public policy, would be deemed
not to violate a no contest clause.  This bill would also delete the
requirement that certain of these actions be based on probable cause
and substitute instead a reasonable cause standard, as defined.  The
bill would exempt a codicil executed after January 1, 2001, from
these provisions, unless the codicil specifically adds or amends a no
contest clause contained in the will or other testamentary
instrument executed before January 1, 2001.
   Existing law provides that a beneficiary may apply to a court for
a determination on whether certain motions and petitions will violate
a no contest clause without this application violating the clause,
and includes a noninclusive list of particular claims to which this
law applies.
   This bill would expand this list.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


  SECTION 1.  Section 366.3 is added to the Code of Civil Procedure,
to read:
   366.3.  (a) If a person has a claim which arises from a promise or
agreement with a decedent to distribution from an estate or trust or
under other instrument, whether the promise or agreement was made
orally or in writing, an action to enforce the claim to distribution
may be commenced within one year after the date of death, and the
limitations period that would have been applicable does not apply.
   (b) The limitations period provided in this section for
commencement of an action shall not be tolled or extended for any
reason except as provided in Part 3 (commencing with Section 21300)
of Division 11 of the Probate Code.
   (c) This section applies to actions brought on claims concerning
persons dying on or after the effective date of this section.
  SEC. 2.  Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 150) of Part 3 of
Division 2 of the Probate Code is repealed.
  SEC. 3.  Section 1811 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   1811.  (a) Subject to Section 1813, the spouse or an adult child,
parent, brother, or sister of the proposed conservatee may nominate a
conservator in the petition or at the hearing on the petition.
   (b) Subject to Section 1813, the spouse or a parent of the
proposed conservatee may nominate a conservator in a writing signed
either before or after the petition is filed and the nomination
remains effective notwithstanding the subsequent legal incapacity or
death of the spouse or parent.
  SEC. 4.  Section 1813 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   1813.  (a) The spouse of a proposed conservatee may not petition
for the appointment of a conservator for a spouse or be appointed as
conservator of the person or estate of the proposed conservatee
unless the petitioner alleges in the petition for appointment as
conservator, and the court finds, that the spouse is not a party to
any action or proceeding against the proposed conservatee for legal
separation, dissolution of marriage, annulment, or adjudication of
nullity of their marriage.  However, if the court finds by clear and
convincing evidence that the appointment of the spouse, who is a
party to an action or proceeding against the proposed conservatee for
legal separation, dissolution, separation, annulment, adjudication
of nullity of their marriage, or has obtained a judgment in any of
these proceedings, is in the best interests of the proposed
conservatee, the court may appoint the spouse.
   Prior to making this appointment, the court shall appoint counsel
to consult with and advise the conservatee, and to report to the
court his or her findings concerning the suitability of appointing
the spouse as conservator.
   (b) The spouse of a conservatee shall disclose to the conservator,
or if the spouse is the conservator, shall disclose to the court,
the filing of any action or proceeding against the conservatee for
legal separation, dissolution of marriage, annulment, or adjudication
of nullity of marriage, within 10 days of the filing of the action
or proceeding by filing a notice with the court and serving the
notice according to the notice procedures under this title.  The
court may, upon receipt of the notice, set the matter for hearing on
an order to show cause why the appointment of the spouse as
conservator, if the spouse is the conservator, should not be
terminated and a new conservator appointed by the court.
  SEC. 4.2.  Section 1827 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   1827.  The court shall hear and determine the matter of the
establishment of the conservatorship according to the law and
procedure relating to the trial of civil actions, including trial by
jury if demanded by the proposed conservatee.
  SEC. 4.4.  Section 1863 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   1863.  (a) The court shall hear and determine the matter according
to the law and procedure relating to the trial of civil actions,
including trial by jury if demanded by the conservatee.  The
conservator, the conservatee, or the spouse or any relative or friend
of the conservatee or other interested person may appear and support
or oppose the petition.
   (b) If the court determines that the conservatorship is no longer
required or that grounds for establishment of a conservatorship of
the person or estate, or both, no longer exist, the court shall make
such a finding and shall enter judgment terminating the
conservatorship accordingly.
   (c) At the hearing, or thereafter on further notice and hearing,
the conservator may be discharged and the bond given by the
conservator may be exonerated upon the settlement and approval of the
conservator's final account by the court.
   (d) Termination of conservatorship does not preclude a new
proceeding for appointment of a conservator on the same or other
grounds.
  SEC. 4.6.  Section 11603 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   11603.  (a) If the court determines that the requirements for
distribution are satisfied, the court shall order distribution of the
decedent's estate, or such portion as the court directs, to the
persons entitled thereto.
   (b) The order shall:
   (1) Name the distributees and the share to which each is entitled.

   (2) Provide that property distributed subject to a limitation or
condition, including, but not limited to, an option granted under
Chapter 16 (commencing with Section 9960) of Part 5, is distributed
to the distributees subject to the terms of the limitation or
condition.
   (c) If the whereabouts of a distributee named in the order is
unknown, the order shall provide for alternate distributees and the
share to which each is entitled.  The alternate distributees shall be
the persons, to the extent known or reasonably ascertainable, who
would be entitled under the decedent's will or under the laws of
intestate succession if the distributee named in the order had
predeceased the decedent, or in the case of a devise for a charitable
purpose, under the doctrine of cy pres.  If the distributee named in
the order does not claim the share to which the distributee is
entitled within five years after the date of the order, the
distributee is deemed to have predeceased the decedent for the
purpose of this section and the alternate distributees are entitled
to the share as provided in the order.
  SEC. 5.  Section 21305 is added to the Probate Code, to read:
   21305.  (a) For instruments executed after the effective date of
this section, the following actions shall not constitute a contest
unless expressly identified in the no contest clause as a violation
of the clause:
   (1) The filing of a creditor's claim or prosecution of an action
based upon it.
   (2) An action or proceeding to determine the character of
property.
   (3) A challenge to the validity of an instrument, contract,
agreement, beneficiary designation, or other document, other than the
instrument containing the no contest clause.
   (4) A petition for settlement or for compromise affecting the
terms of the instrument.
   (b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any instrument,
the following proceedings shall not violate a no contest clause as a
matter of public policy:
   (1) A petition seeking relief under Chapter 3 (commencing with
Section 15400) of Part 2 of Division 9.
   (2) A petition under Part 3(commencing with Section 1800) of
Division 4.
   (3) A petition under Part 2(commencing with Section 4100) of
Division 4.5.
   (4) A petition seeking an order annulling a marriage of the person
who executed the instrument containing the no contest clause.
   (5) A petition pursuant to Section 2403.
   (6) A petition challenging the exercise of a fiduciary power.
   (7) A petition objecting to the appointment of a fiduciary or
seeking the removal of a fiduciary.
   (8) Objections or other responsive pleading to an accounting of a
fiduciary.
   (c) Nothing in this section shall apply to a codicil executed
after January 1, 2001, unless the codicil specifically adds or amends
a no contest clause contained in the will or other testamentary
instrument executed before January 1, 2001.
  SEC. 6.  Section 21306 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   21306.  (a) A no contest clause is not enforceable against a
beneficiary to the extent the beneficiary, with reasonable cause,
brings a contest that is limited to one or more of the following
grounds:
   (1) Forgery.
   (2) Revocation.
   (3) An action to establish the invalidity of any transfer
described in Section 21350.
   (b) "Reasonable cause" is defined for the purposes of this section
to mean that the party filing the action, proceeding, contest, or
objections has possession of facts that would cause a reasonable
person to believe that the allegations and other factual contentions
in the matter filed with the court may be proven or, if specifically
so identified, are likely to be proven after a reasonable opportunity
for further investigation or discovery.
  SEC. 7.  Section 21320 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
   21320.  (a) If an instrument containing a no contest clause is or
has become irrevocable, a beneficiary may apply to the court for a
determination whether a particular motion, petition, or other act by
the beneficiary, including, but not limited to, creditor claims under
Part 4 (commencing with Section 9000) of Division 7, Part 8
(commencing with Section 19000) of Division 9, and Part 7 (commencing
with Section 21700) of Division 11, would be a contest within the
terms of the no contest clause.
   (b) A no contest clause is not enforceable against a beneficiary
to the extent an application under subdivision (a) by the beneficiary
is limited to the procedure and purpose described in subdivision (a)
and does not require a determination of the merits of the motion,
petition, or other act by the beneficiary.
   (c) A determination of whether Section 21306 or 21307 would apply
in a particular case may not be made under this section.
  SEC. 8.  Part 7 (commencing with Section 21700) is added to
Division 11 of the Probate Code, to read:

      PART 7.  CONTRACTS REGARDING TESTAMENTARY OR INTESTATE
SUCCESSION

   21700.  (a) A contract to make a will or devise or other
instrument, or not to revoke a will or devise or other instrument, or
to die intestate, if made after the effective date of this statute,
can be established only by one of the following:
   (1) Provisions of a will or other instrument stating the material
provisions of the contract.
   (2) An expressed reference in a will or other instrument to a
contract and extrinsic evidence proving the terms of the contract.
   (3) A writing signed by the decedent evidencing the contract.
   (4) Clear and convincing evidence of an agreement between the
decedent and the claimant or a promise by the decedent to the
claimant that is enforceable in equity.
   (5) Clear and convincing evidence of an agreement between the
decedent and another person for the benefit of the claimant or a
promise by the decedent to another person for the benefit of the
claimant that is enforceable in equity.
   (b) The execution of a joint will or mutual wills does not create
a presumption of a contract not to revoke the will or wills.
   (c) A contract to make a will or devise or other instrument, or
not to revoke a will or devise or other instrument, or to die
intestate, if made prior to the effective date of this section, shall
be construed under the law applicable to the contract prior to the
effective date of this section.
